Disposed

The Naresh Co-Op. Hou. Soc. and Ors. v. the State of Maha. Thr. Gp and Anr.

Bombay HC5 Apr 2023WP/4023/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court granted two weeks to permit a personal hearing under Article 226 of the Constitution and finally disposed of Revision Application No. 397 of 2018 by the Hon'ble Minister, Co-operation.

What did the court decide?

Directions to dispose Revision Application No. 397 of 2018 by 9 June 2023 with personal hearing, notice, reasoned final order in English/Marathi, and suspension of coercive steps for 2 weeks if prejud

The Naresh Co-Op. Hou. Soc. and Ors. Vs the State of… — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2023)

¶1

10-WP-4023-2023.doc

¶2

1 / 3

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY Digitally signed byPURTI CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PURTI PRASAD PRASAD PARAB PARAB Date: 2023.04.06 19:10:24 +0530 WRIT PETITION NO. 4023 OF 2023

¶4

The Naresh Co.operative Housing Society and Ors.

¶5

….Petitioners

¶6

V/s.

¶7

The State of Maharashtra and Anr.

¶8

…Respondents

¶9

¶10

Ms. Darshna Naval i/b Mr. Sachin Tigde for Petitioners. Ms. K.N. Solunke, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 and 2.

¶11

¶12

CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM &

¶13

RAJESH S. PATIL, JJ. DATED : 5^th APRIL 2023

¶14

P.C. :

¶15

The only relief sought in this petition is for a Writ of Mandamus

¶16

or direction or order to Respondent No.2 to pass final order in Revision Application No. 397 of 2018 at the earliest. It is petitioners’ case that a personal hearing was granted and heard by the Hon’ble Minister on 12^th June 2018 but no orders have been passed till date. Ms. Naval submitted that in the earlier Writ Petition filed by petitioners being Writ Petition No. 6456 of 2018, this court by directing the status-quo to be maintained had also observed that notwithstanding hearing and closing the matter for orders on 12^th June 2018 by the Hon’ble Minister, Co-operation, no orders have been passed.

¶17

When the petition was taken up for admission in the pre lunch session, learned AGP requested the matter be stood over so that she could Purti Parab

¶18

10-WP-4023-2023.doc

¶19

2 / 3

¶20

take instructions on how long it would take to grant a personal hearing and pass final orders. In the post lunch session, learned AGP stated that eight weeks time be granted to give personal hearing as also pass final orders in the Revision Application.

¶21

In view of the statement made by the learned AGP, we dispose the petition with following directions :

¶22

(a) The Hon’ble Minister, Co-operation shall dispose the Revision Application being Revision Application No. 397 of 2018 on or before 9^th June 2023.

¶23

(b) The parties to the Revision Application shall be given a personal hearing, notice whereof shall be communicated at least five working days in advance.

¶24

(c) Should any of the party wish to file written submissions, the same shall be filed within three working days of the conclusion of the personal hearing.

¶25

(d) The order to be passed shall be a reasoned order dealing with all submissions of the parties. If the order is in Marathi language an English translation thereof shall also be provided alongwith the order.

¶26

(e) If the order is prejudicial to the interest of petitioners no coercive steps to be taken for two weeks

¶27

after the order is communicated to petitioner.

¶28

Purti Parab

¶29

10-WP-4023-2023.doc

¶30

3 / 3

¶31

We clarify that we have not made any observations on the

¶32

merits of the matter.

¶33

5. Writ Petition disposed accordingly

¶34

(RAJESH S. PATIL, J.)

¶35

( K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)

¶36

Purti Parab

The Naresh Co-Op. Hou. Soc. and Ors. v. the State of Maha. Thr. Gp and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Naresh Co-Op. Hou. Soc. and Ors. v. the State of Maha. Thr. Gp and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Aashirvad Projects Vs Addhar Mercantile Pvt. Ltd.

Aashirvad Projects Vs Addhar Mercantile Pvt. Ltd.

Narottamdas Goel Vs Bonanza Portfolio Ltd.

Bassein Catholic Co. Op Bank Ltd. Thr Its Chief Executive Officer Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Saptashrungi Infrastructure Buildcon Pvt. Ltd.through Authorized Signatory of Ramesh P. Chokasi Vs State of Maharashtra through Superintending Engineer,Nashik

Shri Makvel Nazreth Misquitta Shareholder of Bassein Catholic Co-Op Vs Bassein Catholic Co-Op Bank Ltd. Thr. Chief Executive Officer and Ors.