Dismissed

The State of Maharashtra (through the Special Land Acquisition Officer,) v. Smt. Leelabai Ambaji Patil and Other

Bombay HC25 Apr 2023FA/1096/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court dismissed the first appeal as the appellant failed to comply with a previous order directing the deposit of the awarded land acquisition amount within the stipulated time.

What did the court decide?

The first appeal was dismissed as the appellant did not comply with the direction to deposit the awarded amount within the stipulated time.

The State of Maharashtra (through the Special Land… — Land Acquisition | Bombay HC (2023)

¶1

Digitally signed by GAURI GAURI AMIT 1/2 912.FA-1096-2022.doc AMIT GAEKWAD GAEKWAD Date: 2023.04.26 13:01:16 +0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶2

FIRST APPEAL NO.1096 OF 2022

¶3

The State of Maharashtra (through the Special Land Acquisition Officer) …..Appellant

¶4

Vs.

¶5

Leelabai Ambaji Patil and Anr. …..Respondents ----

¶6

Mr. A.R. Patil, AGP for appellant. None for respondents.

¶7

CORAM : K. R. SHRIRAM & RAJESH S. PATIL, JJ. DATED : 25^th APRIL 2023

¶8

P.C. :

¶9

1 Mr. Patil states that appellant has not complied with the

¶10

directions given in the order dated 27^th November 2019. Paragraph 7 of the said order reads as under :

¶11

Hence, the following order :

¶12

(a) The Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (b), on condition that, the applicant shall deposit entire awarded amount with interest and cost, if any, in Reference Court, on or before 29/02/2020, failing which the Civil Application shall stand dismissed without referring back to the court. Prayer clause (b) reads thus :

¶13

“(b) that this Hon’ble Court be pleased to stay the operation, execution and implementation of the Judgment and Award dated 29.07.2017 passed by the Learned Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Alibag in L.A.R. No.484 of 2000 (Old L.A.R.No.90/1990), till the hearing and final disposal of the above mentioned First Appeal.”

¶14

(c) If the amount is deposited within time, the Reference court is directed to invest the entire amount in Fixed Deposit Account of any Nationalized bank, initially for the period of one year and the same is to be continued till further order.

¶15

Gauri Gaekwad

¶16

2/2 912.FA-1096-2022.doc

¶17

(d) Liberty is granted to the respondent/claimants, if they so desire, to prefer appropriate application for withdrawal of the amount and that will be decided on its own merit.

¶18

(e) The Civil Application stands disposed of accordingly.

¶19

(f) No order as to costs.

¶20

2 In the circumstances, since it is a self operative order and for almost 3 ½ years this Court’s order has not been complied with, the appeal also stands dismissed.

¶21

3 The State Government to take appropriate action against the concerned officer for dereliction of duty particularly because the law provides an exorbitant rate of 15% per annum to be paid to the persons whose land has been acquired.

¶22

(RAJESH S. PATIL, J.)

¶23

Gauri Gaekwad

The State of Maharashtra (through the Special Land Acquisition Officer,) v. Smt. Leelabai Ambaji Patil and Other

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The State of Maharashtra (through the Special Land Acquisition Officer,) v. Smt. Leelabai Ambaji Patil and Other

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Simarpal Singh Sawhney Vs Madhu Bhatti and 4 Ors.

Kaizer Taher Mithaiwala Vs Shamima Taher Mithaiwala and 5 Ors.

Bnc Power Project Limited Vs Sunil Kotecha and Anr.

Tri-Parulex Fire Protection System Vs Ctr Manufacturing Industries Private Limited

Iolite Softwares Private Limited Vs R. K. Dewan and Company

Dilip Shankar Thete and Ors. Vs Uttam Ganpat Thorat and Ors.