This bail application was allowed to be withdrawn by the Applicant. The Court also directed the Trial Court to expedite the trial as the Applicant has been behind bars for over two years without trial commencing.
Bail application withdrawn; Trial directed to be expedited.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
903-BA-640-2023 .doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 640 OF 2023
Sanket Sunil Jadhav
… Applicant
V/s.
State of Maharashtra… Respondent
Mr. R. V. Bansode, Advocate for Applicant.
Ms. Anamika Malhotra, APP for Respondent-State.
CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
DATE : 12 OCTOBER, 2023
P. C:-
1. Heard learned Counsel for the Applicant and learned APP for Respondent-State.
2. Learned Counsel for the Applicant on instructions seeks leave to withdraw this Application.
3. Considering the submission of learned Counsel for the
Applicant, Application is allowed to be withdrawn.
4. Dismissed and disposed off.
5. Learned Counsel for the Applicant submits that Applicant is behind the bar for more than two years, yet trial has not commenced, hence direction be given to expedite the trial.
S.S.Kilaje page 1 of 2
903-BA-640-2023 .doc
6. Considering the submission of learned Counsel for the
Applicant, Trial Court is requested to expedite the trial.
Digitally signed SONALI by SONALISATISH SATISH KILAJEDate: KILAJE 2023.10.1316:59:14 +0530
(SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)
S.S.Kilaje page 2 of 2
Sanket Sunil Jadhav
State of Maharashtra
Shivkumar Dige
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court