Bail application under CrPC was allowed to be withdrawn on instructions. Directions were issued to the Trial Court to expedite the trial in view of the two-year delay in framing of charges.
Bail application allowed to be withdrawn; Trial Court directed to expedite the trial.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
11-ba-494-2022.doc
Shubhada S Kadam
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO. 494 OF 2022
Sumit N. Koradia …. Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra and anr. …. Respondents
Mr. Samay Pawar, Advocate for the Applicant. Ms. Pallavi N. Dabholkar, APP for Respondent-State. Ms. Chaitali Kamble i/b. Mr. Ajay Dubey, Advocate for Respondent No.2.
CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J. DATE : 11th OCTOBER, 2023.
P.C. :
respondent No.2 and learned APP.
applicant who is present in Court, seeks leave to withdraw the application. Considering his request, application is allowed to be withdrawn and disposed off.
behind bar for more than 2 years, yet charge has not been framed,
hence, direction be given to the Trial Court to expedite the trial.
1/2
Digitally signed by SHUBHADA SHUBHADA SHANKAR SHANKAR KADAM KADAM Date: 2023.10.13 11:04:31 +0530
11-ba-494-2022.doc
Shubhada S Kadam
applicant, Trial Court is requested to expedite the trial.
(SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)
2/2
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the bail application should be allowed to be withdrawn.
Whether the Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial.
Whether the charge sheet in the long-pending case should be moved forward.
Sumit N. Koradia
The State of Maharashtra
SHIVKUMAR DIGE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
