This is a bail application under POCSO. The court expressed disinclination to grant bail, but the applicant sought a withdrawal, which was allowed, resulting in the dismissal of the application.
Leave granted to withdraw the bail application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
23- B.A. No. 1931-2022.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
23 BAIL APPLICATION NO.1931 OF 2022
VITHAL GUNDERAO GONE VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Momale U.l. APP for Respondents: Mr. S. P. Deshmukh Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. S. T. Kazi
(Appointed through legal aid)
CORAM : S.G. MEHARE J. DATE : 16.01.2023.
PER COURT :-
learned A.P.P. for the respondent No.1/State and learned counsel for respondent No.2/victim, the Court expressed disinclination to grant bail. The learned counsel for the applicant, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the application. Leave granted.
(S.G. MEHARE J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted in a case under POCSO?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Vithal Gunderao Gone
The State of Maharashtra
Another
S.G. Mehare
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
