Single judge allowed bail application. Court noted absence of direct evidence and victim naming only coaccused, concluding applicant deserves bail subject to standard conditions.
Bail allowed on furnishing P.B. and S.B. of Rs.50,000/- with one solvent surety of the like amount.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
944- B. A. No. 10-2023.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
944 BAIL APPLICATION NO.10 OF 2023
SHRIKANT CHANDRAKANT SELUKAR VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Rathi Swapnil S. APP for Respondents: Mr. K. S. Patil
CORAM : S.G. MEHARE J. DATE : 13.01.2023.
PER COURT :-
ORDER
2
944- B. A. No. 10-2023.odt
Crime No. 0342 of 2022, registered with Nanalpeth Police Station, District Parbhani for the ofence punishable under Section 363-A read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code on the condition that he shall not tamper with the prosecution witnesses.
(S.G. MEHARE J.)
ysk
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant is eligible for bail given lack of direct evidence against him and the statement of the victim who named coaccused.
Whether there is any threat to the applicant's life or liberty in the current circumstances.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
SHRIKANT CHANDRAKANT SELUKAR
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
S.G. MEHARE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
