Disposed
Suyadnya Vashist Maindad v. the State of Maharashtra and Another
Bombay HCAPPLN/537/2023
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
30 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.537 OF 2023
SUYADNYA VASHIST MAINDAD VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Umesh Gite h/f. Mr. N.B. Khandare APP for the respondent – State : Mr. M.M. Nerlikar
CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL & M. M. SATHAYE, JJ.
DATE : 13 MARCH 2023
PC :
Learned advocate for the applicant, on instructions, seeks
leave to withdraw the application.
[ M. M. SATHAYE ] [ MANGESH S. PATIL ] JUDGE JUDGE
arp/
Suyadnya Vashist Maindad
The State of Maharashtra
Mangesh S. Patil
M. M. Sathaye
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court