Gondia would be necessary, is not at all acceptable. In my view, in those cases the evidence has yet to commence. The transfer of those cases and clubbing of those cases with the three cases pending at Nagpur would stall the progress of the three cases, which are at the advanced stage at Nagpur. It has been stated in the application by the applicants that the learned Judge before whom three cases are pending is overburdened. It has also been stated that due to the other workload, substantial progress has not been made in the matter, despite the matter having been made time bound by this Court. In my view, this would give an idea of the real state of affairs. The learned Judge seized with the three cases at Nagpur has made the substantial progress. It is seen that there is no commonality as far as the witnesses and the Investigating Officers in all the cases. Therefore, in my view, the transfer of the cases from Gondia, Amravati and Akola to Nagpur will not ensure the speedy trial. In my view, in the fact situation it may further delay the proceeding. It can cause inconvenience to the Court at Nagpur, which is bound to dispose of the matter in a time bound manner within stipulated time. It is seen that all the efforts have been made by the Court to comply the order of this Court. Therefore, in my view, the transfer of the three cases from Akola, Amravati and Gondia instead of ensuring the speedy trial would stall the progress
