A criminal writ petition was disposed of as infructuous because the State filed a revision challenging the impugned order of the Judicial Magistrate, and the Sessions Court had granted a stay over that order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 24.wp.60.2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 60 OF 2023
Rajendra S/o. Harichandra Bhendarkar .VS. State of Maharashtra
_______________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders.
Ms Gauravi Mishra, Adv. h/f. Mr. V. S. Mishra, Advocate for the petitioner Ms M. H. Deshmukh, APP for the respondent
CORAM : G.A. SANAP, J. DATE : MARCH 15, 2023.
Learned holding Advocate for the petitioner submits that against the order passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Sadak Arjuni dated 30.12.2022, the State has filed the revision and the Sessions Court has granted stay to the order. Learned holding Advocate submits that as such, this petition has become infructuous and it may be disposed of accordingly.
(G. A. SANAP, J.)
Namrata
Signed By:NAMRATA YOGESH DHARKAR P. A. High Court Nagpur Signing Date:15.03.2023 18:20
Rajendra S/o. Harichandra Bhendarkar
State of Maharashtra
G. A. Sanap
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
