The High Court of Judicature at Bombay rejected an application for cancellation of bail that had been granted in an appeal against conviction for an offence under Section 302 IPC.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
bipin prithiani
1
2-appa-7.19.doc
BIPINDHARMENDER Digitally signed byBIPIN DHARMENDERPRITHIANI IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY PRITHIANI Date: 2023.02.1611:25:10 +0530 CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 7 OF 2019
IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 72 OF 2004
Anusaya Vishwanath More & Ors.
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
… Respondents
None for the Applicant. Mr. Sachindra B. Shetye for the Respondent No.2. Mr. V. B. Konde-Deshmukh, APP for the Respondent-State.
CORAM: NITIN W. SAMBRE AND R. N. LADDHA, JJ.
DATE : 15th FEBRUARY, 2023
P.C. :-
. This is an application for cancellation of bail, which was granted by this Court in an Appeal against conviction. The respondent/accused was convicted for an offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
4. In that view of the matter, application stands rejected.
[R. N. LADDHA, J.] [NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.]
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the bail granted in the appeal against conviction should be cancelled.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Anusaya Vishwanath More & Ors.
The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
Nitin W. Sambre
R. N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
