This is a two-line order where the High Court of Judicature at Bombay disposed of an interim bail application in Criminal Appeal No. 749 of 2018. Oral arguments were held, but the order is a bare disposal without recorded reasons as the matter was not pressed for hearing.
The interim application was disposed of accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1
45.IA.245.2023.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 245 OF 2023 IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 749 OF 2018
Suhas Dashrath Jagtap ...Applicant/Appellant versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent
Ms Vrushali L. Maindad a/w. Adv. Shaheen Kapadia for the Applicant/Appellant. Mr. V. B. Konde, APP for the respondent-state.
CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE &
R. N. LADDHA, JJ
DATED : 14th FEBRUARY, 2023
P.C.:
interim application for grant of bail is not pressed by learned counsel for the applicant/appellant.
ANANT Digitally signed byANANT KRISHNA KRISHNA NAIK Date: 2023.02.15 NAIK 16:01:47 +0530
(R. N. LADDHA, J)
(NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.)
1/1
akn
Suhas Dashrath Jagtap
The State of Maharashtra
Nitin W. Sambre
R. N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
