This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Digitally signed by CHITRA CHITRA SANJAY SANJAY SONAWANE SONAWANE Date: 2023.02.17 10:57:22 +0530
13-APL-38-2018.doc
Chitra Sonawane
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.38 OF 2018
Jeevan Madhukar Yadav & Ors.
… Applicants.
Versus
… Dhanashri Jivan Yadav & Anr. Respondents.
Mr Om Lalpate, Advocate i/by Kuldeep U. Nikam, for the Applicants.
Smt MM Deshmukh, for the Respondent-State.
CORAM: NITIN W. SAMBRE AND R. N. LADDHA, JJ.
DATE : 15 FEBRUARY 2023.
P.C. :-
Learned APP, on instructions, informs that the Applicants are already acquitted. As such, the petition has rendered infructuous. 2. In view of appropriate statement made by the learned APP, the Application stands disposed of. 3. Copy of judgment of acquittal, is taken on record.
[R. N. LADDHA, J.] [NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.]
Nitin W. Sambre
R. N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
