This application under Section 482 CrPC for quashing FIR was pending since 2019. The applicant failed to appear despite notice. The court noted the applicant was already charge-sheeted and disposed of the application without prejudice to other remedies.
The application stands disposed of; no other remedy is barred.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(901)-APL-72-19.doc .
Digitally signed by BALAJI BALAJIGOVINDRAO GOVINDRAOPANCHAL PANCHAL Date: 2023.02.24 16:31:00 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.72 OF 2019
Shri. Dhanesh Sunil Bhanushali ..Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Respondents
None for the Applicant.
Mr. A. R. Kapadnis, APP for the Respondent/State. Mr. Ubale, PSI, Arnala Police Station – present.
CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE &
R. N. LADDHA, JJ.
DATE : 24th FEBRUARY, 2023
P.C.
[R. N. LADDHA, J.]
[NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.]
BGP. 1 o f 1
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to discharge the pending application for quashing of FIR when the applicant is already charge-sheeted.
Whether to continue proceedings in the absence of the applicant despite notice of appearance.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Dhanesh Sunil Bhanushali
The State of Maharashtra
NITIN W. SAMBRE
R. N. LADDHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
