On second call, no applicants' counsel appeared. Counsel for respondents informed that the trial had commenced post-charge framing. The application was disposed of as there was no reason to keep it pending.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Digitally signed by CHITRA CHITRA SANJAY SANJAY SONAWANE SONAWANE Date: 2023.02.24 11:31:23 +0530
7-APL-20-2019.doc
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRI. APPLICATION NO.20 OF 2019
M/s Shree Steel Corporation (A-1) & Ors.
… Applicants.
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ... Respondents.
None for the Applicants.
Mr. Kuldeep Patil a/w Adv. Nikhil Hire for Respondent-CBI.
Mr A.R. Kapadnis, APP for Respondent-State.
Ms Kalyani Wagle, i/b T.N. Tripathi & Co. for Respondent No.2.
CORAM: NITIN W. SAMBRE & R. N. LADDHA, JJ.
DATE : 23 FEBRUARY 2023.
P.C. :-
On second call, none appeared for the Applicants.
Chitra Sonawane.
2
7-APL-20-2019.doc
commenced.
[NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.]
Chitra Sonawane.
M/s Shree Steel Corporation (A-1) & Ors.
The State of Maharashtra
Central Bureau of Investigation
Indian Overseas Bank
Nitin W. Sambre
R. N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
