The High Court dismissed the criminal application for want of prosecution as the applicant failed to appear despite prior listing and notice.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Digitally signed by CHITRA CHITRA SANJAY SANJAY SONAWANE SONAWANE Date: 2023.02.24 11:31:22 +0530
16-APL.209.2020.doc
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.209 OF 2020
Smt. Gunja Sunil Gupta … Applicant Versus
The State Of Maharashtra & Anr. … Respondents
None for the Applicant.
Mr SS Hulke, APP for the Respondent-State.
CORAM: NITIN W. SAMBRE AND R. N. LADDHA, JJ.
DATE : 23 FEBRUARY 2023.
P.C. :-
On second call, none appeared for the Applicant, inspite of name of learned Counsel for the Applicant, being flashed on the electronic board.
[R. N. LADDHA, J.] [NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.]
Chitra Sonawane.
Smt. Gunja Sunil Gupta
The State Of Maharashtra
Nitin W. Sambre
R. N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
