Criminal Writ Petition and Criminal Application withdrawn by parties after One Respondent died; Court granted leave to withdraw and dismissed matters.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
bipin prithiani
1
7-wp-1411.16 & anr.doc
BIPINDHARMENDERPRITHIANI Digitally signed by BIPINDHARMENDER PRITHIANIDate: 2023.11.30 17:54:36+0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1411 OF 2016
Viacom 18 Motion Pictures … Petitioner Versus
… Satyaprakash Ladharam Mangtani & Anr. Respondents
WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 410 OF 2016
Mahesh Kothare … Applicant
Versus
… Satyaprakash Ladharam Mangtani & Anr. Respondents
Ms. Megha Chandra a/w Madhu Gadodia, Sujoy Mukherji and Nishi Jain i/by Naik Naik & Co. for the Petitioner. Mr. Subodh Desai a/w Mr. Hrishikesh Chavan for the Applicant in APL/410/2016.
Mr. Vignesh Ashokan i/by Mr. A. S. Rao for the Respondent No.1. Mr. R. M. Pethe, APP for the Respondent No.2-State.
CORAM: R. N. LADDHA, J.
DATE : 30 NOVEMBER 2023
P.C. :-
. Mr Vignesh Ashokan, learned counsel for respondent No.1, informs the Court that respondent No.1-Satyaprakash Ladharam Mangtani has expired. He tendered a copy of death certificate of respondent No.1.
bipin prithiani
2
7-wp-1411.16 & anr.doc
applicant, on instructions, seek leave to withdraw these matters. Leave granted.
R. N. LADDHA, J.
Viacom 18 Motion Pictures
Bipin Dhiramender Prithiani
Satyaprakash Ladharam Mangtani
Mahesh Kothare
R. N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
