In CWP regarding a writ petition, the petitioner was granted leave to withdraw the petition based on counsel's instructions. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Leave granted to withdraw this petition. The petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
bipin prithiani
1
16-wp-4970.18.doc
BIPINDHARMENDERPRITHIANI Digitally signed by BIPINDHARMENDER PRITHIANIDate: 2023.11.29 18:32:44+0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 4970 OF 2018
The Directorate of Enforcement … Petitioner Versus … Chhagan Chandrakant Bhujbal & Anr. Respondents
Mr. Harsh Dedhia h/f Mr. H. S. Venegaokar for the Petitioner. Mr. A. D. Kamkhedkar, APP for the Respondent No.2-State.
CORAM: R. N. LADDHA, J.
DATE : 29 NOVEMBER 2023
P.C. :-
. Mr Harsh Dedhia, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw this petition. Leave granted.
R. N. LADDHA, J.
The Directorate of Enforcement
Chhagan Chandrakant Bhujbal
R. N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
