M/S. Amit Traders v. Rupal Rajesh Bhojani and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Criminal application dismissed for want of prosecution due to absence of the applicant's counsel on two consecutive hearing dates.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
bipin prithiani
1
1-apl-855.16.doc
BIPINDHARMENDERPRITHIANI Digitally signed by BIPINDHARMENDER PRITHIANIDate: 2023.12.01 18:22:46+0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 855 OF 2016
M/s. Amit Traders … Applicant Versus … Rupal Rajesh Bhojani & Anr. Respondents
None for the Applicant.
Mr. A. D. Kamkhedkar, APP for the Respondent No.2-State.
CORAM: R. N. LADDHA, J.
DATE : 1 DECEMBER 2023
P.C. :-
. On 25 October 2023, none appeared for the applicant and therefore, the matter was adjourned for today under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Today also, none present for the applicant.
R. N. LADDHA, J.
M/s. Amit Traders
Rupal Rajesh Bhojani & Anr.
R. N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court