Allowed

Bipin Makbul Mashi and Anr. v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Bombay HC6 Nov 2023APEAL/367/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court allowed joint criminal appeals BA367/493/372/2023. Orders granting protection from arrest were made absolute. The condition prohibiting contact with the complainant continues till trial's conclusion.

What did the court decide?

Orders allowing protection from arrest made absolute; condition against contacting complainant/witnesses continued; Legal Services Authority directed to pay appointed advocate.

Bipin Makbul Mashi and Anr. Vs State of Maharashtra… — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Bombay HC (2023)

¶1

(4)Apeal-367-2023+.doc

¶2

rajshree

¶3

Digitally signed by RAJSHREE RAJSHREE KISHOR KISHOR MORE MORE Date: 2023.11.07 11:56:57 +0530

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶5

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶6

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.367 OF 2023

¶7

Bipin Makbul Mashi & Anr. ] .. Appellants vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr. ] .. Respondents

¶8

WITH

¶9

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.493 OF 2023

¶10

Pramila Vijay Kanase & Ors. ] .. Appellants

¶11

vs.

¶12

State of Maharashtra & Anr. ] .. Respondents

¶13

WITH

¶14

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.372 OF 2023

¶15

Akshay Vijay Kanase ] .. Appellant vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr. ] .. Respondents

¶16

Mr.Ajit Kenjale a/w Sai Kadam, Azharuddin Khan and Prachi Deokar for the Appellants.

¶17

Mr.Y.M. Nakhwa, APP for the State.

¶18

Mr.Subir Sarkar, Appointed Advocate for Respondent No.2.

¶19

ACP D.D. Tele, Vashi Division,Navi Mumbai, present.

¶20

CORAM : BHARATI DANGRE, J

¶21

DATE : 6^th November, 2023.

¶22

P.C.

¶23

1] By the orders dated 30.03.2023 and 31.03.2023, the Appellants are admitted to protection from arrest and were directed to report to the

¶24

1/2

¶25

(4)Apeal-367-2023+.doc

¶26

Investigating Officer. A condition was also imposed that the Appellants shall not, in any way establish contact with the complainant or any other witness in the case.

¶27

2] On the last day of hearing, I had asked the learned APP to ascertain whether the investigation in the subject CR is over and whether custodial interrogation is necessary at this stage.

¶28

On instructions from the Investigating Officer, who is present in the Court, Mr. Agarkar makes a statement that the investigation is largely over with the co-operation rendered by the Appellants and the custodial interrogation is not necessary. He also makes a statement on instructions that the charge-sheet is likely to be filed within a period of 8 to 10 days.

¶29

3] In the wake of above, the orders dated 30.03.2023 and 31.03.2023 deserve to be made absolute, but the condition imposed that the Appellants shall not in any way establish contact with the complainant or pressurize the witnesses, shall continue to govern them, till the conclusion of the trial.

¶30

4] I must record my appreciation for Advocate Mr. Subir Sarkar who was appointed by the Legal Services Authority to represent Respondent No.2 in all the Appeals and the Legal Services Authority shall ensure that the remuneration due and payable to him, shall be disburse within a period of six weeks from today.

¶31

By Continuing the orders dated 30.03.2023 and 31.03.2023, Appeals are allowed.

¶32

[BHARATI DANGRE, J]

¶33

2/2

Bipin Makbul Mashi and Anr. v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bipin Makbul Mashi and Anr. v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raju Laxman Gavali Vs the State of Maharashtra

Nilima Harish Parikh Vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Mrs. Divya Girish Kapadia and Ors. Vs the Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. through Motor Third Party Claim Hub

Jagdish Morarji Thakkar vs Bhagwandas Morarji Thakkar

Santosh Cordeiro vs Motilal Oswal Financial Services Limited

Asaram Mohanrao Chandanshiv Vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.