Disposed

Raju Laxman Gavali v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC4 Nov 2023BA/1708/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Applicant withdrew his third bail application after the court opined that his role in the charge did not warrant release. The court directed the Sessions Court to expedite the trial and conclude it by end of December 2024 before disposing of the application as withdrawn.

What did the court decide?

The Sessions Court directed to expedite the trial and conclude it by 31st December 2024.

Raju Laxman Gavali Vs the State of Maharashtra — Bail and Remand | Bombay HC (2023)

¶1

MANDIRAMILINDSALGAONKAR Digitally signed byMANDIRA MILINDSALGAONKARDate: 2023.11.0613:28:33 +0530

¶2

1/2 14 BA-1708-23.odt

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.1708 OF 2023

¶5

Raju Laxman Gavali .. Applicant

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent

¶8

Mr.Tapan Thatte with Ms.Samiksha Pawar i/b Mr. Ramnik P. Pawar for the Applicant.

¶9

Mrs.M.R.Tidke, A.P.P. for the State/Respondent.

¶10

CORAM: BHARATI DANGRE, J. DATED : 04^th NOVEMBER, 2023

¶11

P.C:-

¶12

The Applicant came to be arrested on 22/08/2018 in C.R.No.308 of 2018 in which he faces the charge under Sections 302, 120-B, 109, 143, 144, 147, 148, 149, 323, 504 of the Indian Penal Code, under Sections 4, 25, 27 of the Arms Act as well as under Section 135 of the Maharashtra Police Act and continued to be incarcerated since then. This is his third application, whereby he seeks his release on bail.

¶13

On haring the learned counsel for the Applicant and the learned A.P.P. for the State and on perusal of the material in the charge-sheet, since I am of the opinion that the role

¶14

M.M.Salgaonkar

¶15

2/2 14 BA-1708-23.odt

¶16

attributed to him in the charge-sheet do not deserve his release on bail, in the wake of the role attributed to him, learned counsel seeks permission to withdraw the application.

¶17

He would, however, make a request that considering the five years incarceration of the Applicant, the trial be expedited, as on the first occasion, when his first bail application was rejected, this Court had directed expediency in conclusion of the trial, but the order was not abided by.

¶18

On such request being made, I direct the Sessions Court, Sangli to expedite the trial in Sessions Case No.153 of 2020 and make every endeavour to conclude it by the end of December, 2024.

¶19

With the aforesaid direction, the Application stands disposed off, as withdrawn.

¶20

( SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J.)

¶21

M.M.Salgaonkar

Raju Laxman Gavali v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Raju Laxman Gavali v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shri.Dilip Rajaram Patil Vs the State of Maharashtra

Ramesh Nilu Chavan Vs the State of Maharashtra

Devidas Rohidas Devkate Vs the State of Maharashtra

Light House Learning Private Limited vs Shri Vahri Education Charitable Trust

Light House Learning Private Limited vs Shri Vahri Education Charitable Trust

Lighthouse Learning Private Limited vs Kaveeya Shri Educational Trust