The criminal writ petition was disposed of on the application of the petitioner, who sought to withdraw the challenge to the maintainability of the proceedings. No substantive legal proposition was laid down.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
MANDIRAMILINDSALGAONKAR Digitally signed byMANDIRA MILINDSALGAONKARDate: 2023.11.0613:28:33 +0530
1/1 1 WP-3616-22.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.3616 OF 2022
Nilima Harish Parikh .. Petitioner Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Anr. .. Respondents
Mr.Omkar P. Mulekar for the Petitioner. Mrs.M.R.Tidke, A.P.P. for the State/Respondent.
CORAM: BHARATI DANGRE, J. DATED : 04th NOVEMBER, 2023
P.C:-
( SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J.)
M.M.Salgaonkar
Nilima Harish Parikh
The State of Maharashtra
Bharati Dangre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
