Petitioner's counsel submitted that the matter was amicably settled between parties and prayed for withdrawal of the writ petition. The court disposed of the petition as withdrawn based on the submission.
Petition disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
28-WP-923-21
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO. 923 OF 2021
PRASHANT RAMDASJI KESALKAR
VERSUS
SOU. MANISHA PRASHANT KESALKAR
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,
appearances, Court's orders of directions
and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's orders
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ms. Manju Ghatode, Advocate for petitioner.
CORAM :G. A. SANAP, J.
DATE:10/02/2022.
The learned Advocate for the petitioner submits that
this matter has been amicably settled between the petitioner
and the respondent. The learned Advocate, on instructions,
prays for withdrawal of the petition.
The petition stands disposed of as withdrawn, in
view of the statement made by the learned Advocate for the
petitioner.
Choulwar
VITHAL Digitally signed byVITHAL MAROTRAO MAROTRAO CHOULWAR Date: 2022.02.10 CHOULWAR 17:05:07 +0530
PRASHANT RAMDASJI KESALKAR
SOU. MANISHA PRASHANT KESALKAR
G. A. SANAP
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court