The petitioner argued the writ petition became infructuous due to a fresh election programme published by the respondents. The court disposed of the petition without further orders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
17.wp.1575.2020.odt
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.1575 OF 2020
Archana Waman Chataki
.vs.
Maharashtra State Election Commission, through its Secretary and oths.
Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
Court's or Judge's Orders.
Mr Suyash Agrawal, Adv. h/f. Mr. S. V. Sirpurkar, Counsel for the petitioner Ms M. A. Barabde, AGP for respondent Nos. 3 and 4
CORAM : G. A. SANAP, J. DATED : 09.02.2022
Heard.
The learned Advocate Mr Suyash Agrawal holding for Mr. S. V. Sirpurkar submits that this petition has become infructuous in view of the fresh election programme published by the respondents.
In view of this statement, the writ petition stands disposed of.
JUDGE
Namrata
Archana Waman Chataki
Maharashtra State Election Commission
G. A. SANAP
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
