Hearing was concluded as the petitioner had died during the pendency of the writ petition, rendering the matter infructuous.
Writ petition disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 3-wp 7199-2014.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 7199 OF 2014
Ramdas Narayan Paikade
.. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others
.. Respondents
Mr. V. S. Panpatte, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr. A. S. Shinde, AGP for Respondents-State.
CORAM : R. D. DHANUKA &
S. G. MEHARE, JJ.
DATED : 11th APRIL 2022.
PER COURT:-
.Mr. Panpatte, learned counsel for the petitioner states that during
the pendency of the writ petition, the petitioner has expired and thus,
the writ petition has become infructuous. Statement is accepted.
2. Writ petition is disposed of as infructuous. No order as to costs.
( S. G. MEHARE )( R. D. DHANUKA )
JUDGE JUDGE
P.S.B.
1 of 1
Ramdas Narayan Paikade
The State of Maharashtra
R. D. DHANUKA
S. G. MEHARE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court