Division Bench restored a dismissed Writ Petition on the condition that applicants do not seek adjournments. No order as to costs.
Civil Application made absolute allowing recall of the dismissal order subject to a condition against future adjournment applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ca5140.22
(1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
928 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5140 OF 2022 IN WP/5983/2020
ARUNABAI TRIMBAK MOTE DECEASED THR LRS SACHIN VILAS MOTE AND ANOTHER
VERSUS
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH COLLECTOR AND OTHERS
Mr. Krushna D. Mote, Advocate for applicants; Mr. S.B. Yawalkar, A.G.P. for respondent-State
CORAM : R.D. DHANUKA AND S. G. MEHARE, JJ. DATE : 8th April, 2022
P.C.
ca5140.22
(2)
unnecessary adjournment whenever this matter is called out on board for admission. No order as to costs.
(S. G. MEHARE, J.)
(R.D. DHANUKA, J.)
amj
SACHIN VILAS MOTE AND ANOTHER
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH COLLECTOR AND OTHERS
R.D. DHANUKA
S. G. MEHARE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
