In this writ petition, the petitioner sought expeditious hearing of a civil suit without entertaining frivolous applications by respondents. The Court held the petition was not maintainable and thoroughly misconceived.
None. Writ Petition dismissed on grounds of non-maintainability and misconceived nature.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
992 WRIT PETITION NO.4048 OF 2022
LAXMIKANT VITTHAL GHAYAL
VERSUS
LAXMAN GOVIND RAUT AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. K. D. Pote h/f Mr. Ambetkar A. G.
CORAM : R. D. DHANUKA, AND
S. G. MEHARE, JJ.
DATE : 12.04.2022
PER COURT:-
1. Present matter is on today’s board and mentioned out of
turn.
2. By this petition, petitioner seeks expeditious hearing of
the Regular Civil Suit No.203 of 2016 without entertaining
frivolous applications of the respondents.
3. In our view present Writ Petition is not maintainable and
is thoroughly misconceived and is accordingly dismissed. No
order as to costs.
(S. G. MEHARE, J.) (R. D. DHANUKA, J.)
vmk/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present writ petition seeking expeditious hearing of a regular civil suit is maintainable.
LAXMIKANT VITTHAL GHAYAL
LAXMAN GOVIND RAUT AND OTHERS
R. D. DHANUKA
S. G. MEHARE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court