Arun Shripati Pawar v. the State of Maharashtra Thr. Principal Secretary and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Counsel for the petitioner sought leave to withdraw writ petition to pursue alternative remedy of appeal. The High Court allowed the withdrawal and kept contentions open.
What the court decided
Y.S.Patil 1 17-WP 2783-22.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.2783 OF 2022
Arun Shripati Pawar … Petitioner Vs.
The State of Maharashtra, Thr. Principal Secretary & Ors. … Respondents
Mr. Vaibhav V. Ugle for the Petitioner. Mr. A.A. Alaspurkar AGP for the Respondent-State. Mr. Rohit Sakhadeo for the Respondent Nos. 2 and 3.
CORAM : A.A. SAYED & ABHAY AHUJA, JJ. DATE : 7TH JUNE, 2022
P.C. :
- Learned Counsel for the Petitioner on instructions seeks leave
to withdraw the Petition to avail the alternate remedy of filing Appeal.
- The Petition is allowed to be withdrawn. It will be open for the
Petitioner to avail the alternate remedy. All contentions of the
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Arun Shripati Pawar
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra, Thr. Principal Secretary & Ors.
Coram
A.A. SAYED
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Mahesh Govind Mehra Vs Gangaram Gangaram Kokkula and 15 Ors.
Atc Telecom Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and 2 Ors.
Bhakti Complex Sahakari Graharachna Sanstha Maryadit Thru Chairman Mr. Daivat Vasantrao Patil Vs the Commissioner Pimpri Chinchwad and Ors.
Shri. Sunil Mankar Vs Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation through Its Manager and Anr.