Disposed

Mr. Sameer Vijay Bhujbal v. the Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation and Anr.

Bombay HC9 Jun 2022WP/6766/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ petition challenged a notice issued under the MRTP Act regarding a structure. The High Court recorded the counsel's undertaking to file a regularization application, directed the corporation to decide it expeditiously, and stayed coercive steps for two weeks post-decision.

What did the court decide?

Stay of coercive steps for two weeks after the regularization application is decided and communicated; direction to dispose of application expeditiously.

Mr. Sameer Vijay Bhujbal Vs the Pimpri Chinchwad… — Specific Performance | Bombay HC (2022)

SRS

502-WP-6766-2022.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO. 6766 OF 2022

¶6

Mr. Sameer Vijay Bhujbal

¶7

.. Petitioner

¶8

V/s

¶9

The Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation & Ors. .. Respondents

¶10

¶11

Ms.Gunjan P. Shah i/b. Mr. K. P. Shah for Petitioner. Mr.Deepak R. More a/w Mr.Shivram A. Gawade for Respondents No.1 and 2.

¶12

Mr. A. A. Alaspurkar – AGP for Respondent No. 3 – State.

¶13

¶14

CORAM: A. A. SAYED & ABHAY AHUJA, JJ.

¶15

DATE : 9^th JUNE 2022

¶16

P.C. :-

¶17

The Petition is filed challenging the notice dated 03/06/2022 issued by the Respondent-Corporation under Section 53 of the MRTP Act.

¶18

Learned Counsel for the Respondent-Corporation states

¶19

that the subject structure is within the blue line under DC Regulations. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner, however, states that there is no mention in the notice that the subject structure

1/3

SRS

502-WP-6766-2022.doc

is falling within the blue line.

¶25

Learned Counsel for the Petitioner, on instructions, states that the Petitioner shall file a Regularization Application online within three weeks from today.

¶26

In the facts and circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice, we dispose of the Petition by passing the following order:

¶27

O R D E R

¶28

(i) We record the statement of learned Counsel for the Petitioner that the Regularization Application shall be filed online by the Petitioner within three weeks from today.

¶29

(ii) If such Regularization Application is filed, the same shall be disposed of by the RespondentCorporation expeditiously and the decision on the same shall be communicated to the Petitioner.

¶30

(iii) Until the Regularization Application is decided and for a period of two weeks from the date of communication of the decision to the Petitioner on the Regularization Application, no coercive

2/3

SRS

502-WP-6766-2022.doc

steps shall be taken against the structure of the Petitioner.

¶36

The Petition is disposed of in the above terms.,

¶37

(ABHAY AHUJA, J.)

¶38

(A. A. SAYED, J.)

¶39

3/3

Mr. Sameer Vijay Bhujbal v. the Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mr. Sameer Vijay Bhujbal v. the Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shri. Sunil Mankar Vs Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation through Its Manager and Anr.

Arun Shripati Pawar Vs the State of Maharashtra Thr. Principal Secretary and Ors.

Mahesh Govind Mehra Vs Gangaram Gangaram Kokkula and 15 Ors.

Polyrub Extrusion Pvt. Ltd. Thr Chandrashekhar D Rane Vs Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation and Anr.

Kanhu Krishna Sandbhor Vs State of Maharashtra Thr Government Pleader and Ors.

Appa Kirshna Sandbhor Vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.