Disposed

Satvik Ramesh Pataniwar Thr Father and Natural Guardian Ramesh Narsimalu Pataniwar v. the State of Maharashtra and Another

Bombay HC18 Apr 2022WP/4339/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay Bench at Aurangad directed the Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate Verification Committee to decide pending tribe claim validation proceedings by 30.06.2022, directing petitioners to appear for verification on 22.04.2022.

What did the court decide?

Respondents directed to decide tribe claim validation by 30.06.2022; petitioners directed to appear on 22.04.2022.

Satvik Ramesh Pataniwar Thr Father and… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Bombay HC (2022)

¶1

wp4339.22, etc.

¶2

(1)

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO.4339 OF 2022

¶5

Satvik S/o Ramesh Pataniwar, Age : 17 years, Occ. Education, R/o Mandva (Ki), Tq. Kinwat, Dist. Nanded, Through Father and natural guardian Ramesh S/o Narsimalu Pataniwar, Age : 44 years, Occ. Service, R/o As above ..PETITIONER

¶6

VERSUS

¶7

The State of Maharashtra, Through its Secretary, Tribal Development Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai

¶8

The Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate Verification Committee, Kinwat, Through its Dy. Director (R), At Aurangabad ..RESPONDENTS

¶9

Mr. S.M. Vibhute, Advocate for petitioner; Mr. A.R. Kale, A.G.P. for respondents

¶10

WITH

¶11

WRIT PETITION NO.4345 OF 2022

¶12

Sanket S/o Suresh Pataniwar Age : 17 years, Occ. Education, R/o Mandva, Tq. Kinwat, Dist. Nanded Through Father and natural guardian Suresh S/op Narsimalu Pataniwar, Age : 42 years, Occ. Agri., R/o As Above ..PETITIONER

¶13

wp4339.22, etc. (2)

¶14

The State of Maharashtra, Through its Secretary, Tribal Development Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai 2. The Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate Verification Committee, Kinwat, Through its Dy. Director (R), At Aurangabad ..RESPONDENTS Mr. S.M. Vibhute, Advocate for petitioner; Mr. S.G. Karlekar, A.G.P. for respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.4330 OF 2022 Sumit S/o Keshavrao Tippanbone, Age : 17 years, Occ. Education, R/o Nadihattarga, Tq. Nilanga, Dist. Latur Through Father and natural guardian Keshav S/o Baburao Tippanbone Age : 43 years, Occ. Service, R/o As above ..PETITIONER VERSUS 1. The State of Maharashtra, Through its Secretary, Tribal Development Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai 2. The Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate Verification Committee, Kinwat, Through its Dy. Director (R), At Aurangabad ..RESPONDENTS

¶15

wp4339.22, etc. (3)

¶16

Mr. S.M. Vibhute, Advocate for petitioner; Mr. S.P. Tiwari, A.G.P. for respondents

¶17

WITH

¶18

WRIT PETITION NO.4391 OF 2022

¶19

Sneha S/o Satish Aspat Age : 17 years, Occ. Education, R/o Vijay Nagar, Nanded, Tq. and Dist. Nanded Through Father and natural guardian Sainath S/o Venkatrao Aspat, Age : 48 years, Occ. Service, R/o As above ..PETITIONER VERSUS 1. The State of Maharashtra, Through its Secretary, Tribal Development Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai 2. The Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate Verification Committee, Kinwat, Through its Dy. Director (R), At Aurangabad ..RESPONDENTS

¶20

Mr. S.M. Vibhute, Advocate for petitioner; Mr. A.R. Kale, A.G.P. for respondents

¶21

CORAM : R.D. DHANUKA AND S. G. MEHARE, JJ. DATE : 18^th April, 2022

¶22

ORAL JUDGMENT (Per R.D. Dhanuka, J.)

¶23

wp4339.22, etc. (4)

¶24

Writ Petition Nos.4330 of 2022 and 4391 of 2022 are not on board. On mentioning, these matters are taken on board.

¶25

Rule. Learned A.G.Ps. waive service for the respondents. Rule made returnable forthwith.

¶26

By these petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners seek an order or direction against respondent no.2 to finalize their tribe claim verification proceedings.

¶27

Learned Counsel for the petitioners invited our attention to the order dated 25.1.2022 passed by the Division Bench of this Court in

¶28

Writ Petition No.1251 of 2022 in the case of Rakshan Shankarrao Chettiwar vs. The State of Maharashtra & anr. and submitted that the similar order may be passed by this Court.

¶29

Learned A.G.Ps. do not dispute that the facts before this Court in these petitions and in Writ Petition No.1251 of 2022 are identical.

¶30

We accordingly pass the following order :-

¶31

wp4339.22, etc. (5)

¶32

In case the proposals seeking validation of the tribe claim of the petitioners are pending with respondent No.2, then respondent No.2 shall endeavour to decide the validation proceedings by 30.06.2022. The petitioners shall appear before the Committee on 22.04.2022. the petitioners shall co-operate in expeditious disposal of the proceedings.

¶33

Writ Petitions stand disposed of.

¶34

Rule is made absolute accordingly. No order as to costs.

¶35

(S. G. MEHARE, J.) (R.D. DHANUKA, J.)

¶36

amj

Satvik Ramesh Pataniwar Thr Father and Natural Guardian Ramesh Narsimalu Pataniwar v. the State of Maharashtra and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Satvik Ramesh Pataniwar Thr Father and Natural Guardian Ramesh Narsimalu Pataniwar v. the State of Maharashtra and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sunita Mashnaji Kantewad Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Basudev Matoliram Agrawal Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Shankar Ghanshyam Borude Vs the State of Maharashtra Thr Its Secretary and Others

Ambadas Rameshrao Dornale Vs the State of Maharashtra through Secretary and Another

Rajan Vilas Baviskar Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Rinkal Chhaburao Mande Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another