Petitioner filed a writ petition which was subsequently withdrawn by her through an unconditionally withdrawing letter submitted by her counsel. The court recorded the withdrawal and dismissed the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
903
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
903 WRIT PETITION NO.408 OF 2020
SUNITA MASHNAJI KANTEWAD
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Ashok A. More
AGP for Respondents State: Mr. A. R. Kale
Advocate for Respondents 3 & 4 : Mr. S.S. Tambe
CORAM: R.D. DHANUKA & S. G. MEHARE, JJ.
DATE : 13th April, 2022
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner tenders a copy of the letteraddressed by his client instructing him to withdraw the petition
unconditionally.
Copy of the letter is taken on record.3. Writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
( S. G. MEHARE, J. ) ( R.D. DHANUKA, J. )
JPC
Page 1 of 1
SUNITA MASHNAJI KANTEWAD
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
R.D. DHANUKA
S. G. MEHARE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court