Disposed

Ambadas Rameshrao Dornale v. the State of Maharashtra through Secretary and Another

Bombay HC18 Apr 2022WP/3509/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad entertained writ petitions seeking quashing of orders and issuance of corrected Tribe Certificates with proper nomenclature. The Court followed a prior decision and directed officers to issue corrected certificates.

What did the court decide?

Direction to Sub Divisional Officers to issue corrected Tribe Certificates within six weeks upon verification of incorrect certificates filed by the petitioners.

Ambadas Rameshrao Dornale Vs the State of… — Public Procurement and Tenders | Bombay HC (2022)

¶1

wp3509.22, etc.

¶2

(1)

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO.3509 OF 2022

¶5

Ambadas S/o Rameshrao Dornale, Age : 29 Years, Occ. Nil, R/o Gonegaon, Tq. Mukhed, Dist. Nanded ..PETITIONER

¶6

VERSUS

¶7

The State of Maharashtra, Through Secretary to Tribal Development Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai

¶8

The Sub Divisional Officer, Degloor, Dist. Nanded ..RESPONDENTS

¶9

Mr. S.M. Vibhute, Advocate for petitioner; Mr. S.P. Tiwari, A.G.P. for respondents

¶10

WITH

¶11

WRIT PETITION NO.4338 OF 2022

¶12

Omkar S/o Govind Pallewad, Age : 17 years, Occ. Education, R/o Dhuppa, Tq. Naigaon (Kh), Dist. Nanded Through Father and Natural Guardian Govind S/o Maroti Pallewad Age : 45 years, Occ. Agri., R/o As above ..PETITIONER

¶13

VERSUS

¶14

The State of Maharashtra, Through Secretary to Tribal

¶15

wp3509.22, etc. (2)

¶16

Development Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai

¶17

The Sub Divisional Officer, Biloli, Dist. Nanded ..RESPONDENTS

¶18

Mr. S.M. Vibhute, Advocate for petitioner; Mr. S. G. Karlekar, A.G.P. for respondents

¶19

CORAM : R.D. DHANUKA AND S. G. MEHARE, JJ. DATE : 18^th April, 2022

¶20

ORAL JUDGMENT (Per R.D. Dhanuka, J.)

¶21

Rule. Learned A.G.P. waives service for the respondents. Rule is made returnable forthwith.

¶22

By these petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have prayed for a Writ of Certiorari for quashing and setting aside the order dated 20.1.2022 passed by respondent no.2, seek an order or direction to correct the nomenclature in the tribe certificates issued to them as “Koli Mahadev”, instead of “Mahadev Koli” and to issue the corrected tribe certificates to the petitioners in format-C.

¶23

wp3509.22, etc. (3)

¶24

Learned Counsel for the petitioners invited our attention to the order passed by this Court on 10.2.2020 in Writ Petition No.2412 of 2020, in the case of Eknath Balaji Tekulwar vs. The State of Maharashtra & anr. and other companion matters and would submit that the facts of the said case and the instant case being identical, similar order may be passed by this Court.

¶25

Learned A.G.Ps. do not dispute that the facts in these petitions and in Writ Petition No.2412 of 2020 and companion matters are identical.

¶26

We accordingly pass the following order:-

¶27

The petitioners shall file on-line applications. The petitioners shall submit the original tribe certificates with incorrect spelling/incorrect format to the concerned Sub Divisional Officer. The concerned Sub Divisional Officer after verifying it’s record of issuance of the certificates shall issue the corrected tribe certificates to the petitioners within a period of six (06) weeks from the date of production of incorrect tribe certificates.

¶28

wp3509.22, etc. (4)

¶29

Writ Petitions are disposed of in aforesaid terms. No order as

¶30

to costs.

¶31

(S. G. MEHARE, J.)

¶32

(R.D. DHANUKA, J.)

¶33

amj

Ambadas Rameshrao Dornale v. the State of Maharashtra through Secretary and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ambadas Rameshrao Dornale v. the State of Maharashtra through Secretary and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sunita Mashnaji Kantewad Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Basudev Matoliram Agrawal Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Shankar Ghanshyam Borude Vs the State of Maharashtra Thr Its Secretary and Others

Rajan Vilas Baviskar Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Rinkal Chhaburao Mande Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Satvik Ramesh Pataniwar Thr Father and Natural Guardian Ramesh Narsimalu Pataniwar Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another