Partly allowed

Ranjit Jamir Kamble v. State of Maharashtra Thr. Secretary School and Education Dpet. and Ors.

Bombay HC5 Apr 2022WP/3986/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ petition concerned the allotment of a Shalarth ID. The High Court directed the Respondent to reconsider the matter in light of specific recommendations and a prior judgment, ordering the allotment of the ID within two weeks. It further mandated the payment of salary and arrears upon id issuance.

What did the court decide?

Respondent No.4 directed to allot Shalarth ID to Petitioner within two weeks and pay salary and arrears within four weeks of ID inclusion.

Ranjit Jamir Kamble Vs State of Maharashtra Thr… — Service and Employment | Bombay HC (2022)

¶1

912-WP-3986-2022.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO. 3986 OF 2022

¶4

Mr. Ranjit Jamir Kamble

¶5

… Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State of Maharashtra and Ors. … Respondents.

¶8

Mr. Nikhil D. Waje, for the Petitioner. Mrs. S.S. Bhende, AGP, for the State-Respondent Nos. 1, 2 & 4.

¶9

CORAM : SUNIL B. SHUKRE AND G.A. SANAP, JJ.

¶10

DATE : 5^th APRIL, 2022. P.C.:

¶11

Heard learned Counsel for the Petitioner and learned AGP, who appears by waiving notice for Respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 4. There is no need to issue any notice to remaining Respondents as the issue involved in this Petition can be decided by Respondent No.5.

¶12

2 Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally, by consent.

¶13

3 It is seen that after the directions issued by Respondent No.4 vide its order dated 21^st October, 2021 for reconsideration of the matter, Respondent No. 5 has indeed reconsidered the matter and reverted back to Respondent

REKHA PRAKASH PATIL

1 of 2

Rekha Patil

Digitally signed by REKHA PRAKASH PATIL Date: 2022.04.08 16:28:25 +0530

¶18

912-WP-3986-2022.doc

¶19

No.4 while making appropriate recommendation of allotment of Shalarth ID of the Petitioner.

¶20

4 In view of above, we find that this Petition can be partly allowed by issuing necessary directions to Respondent No.4.

¶21

5 Petition is partly allowed.

¶22

6 Respondent No.4 is directed to take a fresh decision regarding allotment of Shalarth ID to the Petitioner in accordance with law, duly considering recommendations made by Respondent No.2 and keeping in view the directions issued by this Court in Writ Petition No. 8966 of 2021 ( Amol Baban Sangar Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Ors .,) decided on 21^st February, 2022, at the earliest and in any case, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of the copy this Order.

¶23

7 In case Sharath ID is allotted to the Petitioner, salary and admissible arrears of salary shall be paid to the Petitioner by taking necessary steps within four weeks from the date of including the name of Petitioner in Shalarth system.

¶24

8 Rule made absolute in the above terms. No costs.

¶25

[G.A. SANAP, J.]

¶26

[SUNIL B. SHUKRE, J.]

¶27

2 of 2

¶28

Rekha Patil

Ranjit Jamir Kamble v. State of Maharashtra Thr. Secretary School and Education Dpet. and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ranjit Jamir Kamble v. State of Maharashtra Thr. Secretary School and Education Dpet. and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kum. Akanksha Balasaheb Shinde Vs State of Maharashtra Thr. Secretary and Anr.

Ananda Bapu Patil and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra, through the Secretary and Ors.

Girish Vasant Patil and Os Vs the State of Maharashtra Thr. Secretary and Ors.

Anand Sareen Vs the Deputy Director of Education (Mumbai Div.) and 2 Ors.

Shri. Nikhil Dinkar Ghule Vs the State of Maharashtra through the Secretary, School Edu and Sports Dept. and Ors.

Nitin Ashok Jadhav Vs State of Maharashtra Thr the Honorable Secretary School and Education Dept. and Ors.