A petition where all disputes were settled amicably. The court disposed of the writ petition based on the consent terms produced by the parties.
Disposed of in view of Consent Terms A with no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
902-wp-185-2022.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 185 OF 2022
Anand Sareen … Petitioner Versus The Deputy Director or Education (Mumbai Div.) and Ors. … Respondents.
Mr. Rahul D. Oak a/w Mr.Siddhesh S. Shetye, for the Petitioner. Mr. Arvind Kothari, for the Respondent Nos. 3 and 4.
CORAM : SUNIL B. SHUKRE AND G.A. SANAP, JJ.
DATE : 5th APRIL, 2022. P.C.
The Petitioner and Respondent Nos. 3 and 4 have settled all of their disputes amicably out of the Court, as submitted by the learned Counsel for the Petitioner. Learned Counsel for Respondent Nos. 3 and 4 has endorsed the same. Petitioner and the Principal of the School i.e. Respondent No. 4 are personally present in the Court and they are identified by their respective Counsel. They submit that the Consent Terms which are now produced before the Court and marked as ‘A’ for identification are acceptable to them and they would abide by the same.
2 In view of above, Petition is disposed of in view of the Consent Terms ‘A’. No costs.
[G.A. SANAP, J.]
[SUNIL B. SHUKRE, J.]
REKHA PRAKASH PATIL
1 of 1
Rekha Patil
Digitally signed by REKHA PRAKASH PATIL Date: 2022.04.06 18:40:08 +0530
Anand Sareen
Deputy Director or Education Mumbai Div.
Respondent Nos. 3 and 4
Sunil B. Shukre
G. A. Sanap
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
