Disposed

Girish Vasant Patil and Os v. the State of Maharashtra Thr. Secretary and Ors.

Bombay HC4 Apr 2022WP/5225/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This Court directed the Deputy Director to decide on the transfer of school management from Respondent No.9 to Respondent No.15 within eight weeks and granted liberty to the petitioners to approach the Court regarding any subsequent grievance, disposing of the writ petitions.

What did the court decide?

Direction to Deputy Director (Respondent No.6) to take an appropriate decision on the proposal for transfer of management of schools from Respondent No.9 to Respondent No.15 within eight weeks. Libert

Girish Vasant Patil and Os Vs the State of Maharashtra… — Service and Employment | Bombay HC (2022)

¶1

SMITA Digitally signed by SMITA JOHNSON JOHNSON GONSALVESDate: 2022.05.04 GONSALVES 13:37:15 +0530

¶2

16.wp5224,5225-21.doc

¶3

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO.5224 OF 2021

¶6

Narasu Bharamu Patil And Ors. .. Petitioners v/s.

¶7

The State of Maharashtra Through Secretary .. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors. Respondents WITH

¶8

WRIT PETITION NO.5225 OF 2021

¶9

Girish Vasant Patil And Ors. .. Petitioners

¶10

v/s. The State of Maharashtra Through .. Secretary And Ors. Respondents

¶11

Mr. Prashant Bhavake, for the Petitioners in Writ Petition No.5224 of 2021.

¶12

Mr. N.K. Rajpurohit, AGP, for State.

¶13

Mr. Milan Bhise, a/w. Mr. Amit Bhave, i/b. Milan Bhise & Co., for Respondent No.2.

¶14

Ms. Suchitra Valjee, a/w. Ms. Riya Kamdar, i/b. Manilal Kher Ambalal & Co., for Respondent Nos. 10 to 15.

¶15

CORAM: SUNIL B. SHUKRE & G.A. SANAP, JJ.

DATE : 4 APRIL 2022

P.C:-

Heard.

1 of 2

16.wp5224,5225-21.doc

¶21

¶22

Rule. Heard forthwith by consent.

¶23

We are of the view that the purpose of the petitions shall be served if Respondent No.6 is directed to take his decision on the proposal sent to him by the Education Officer regarding grant of permission for transfer of Management of Schools-Respondent Nos. 10 to 14 by Respondent No. 9 to Respondent No.15.

¶24

Accordingly, we direct the Deputy Director-Respondent No.6 to take appropriate decision on the proposal seeking permission for transfer of Management of Schools-Respondent Nos. 10 to 14 sent to him through Education Officer by Respondent No.9, in accordance with law, at the earliest, preferably within eight weeks from the date of receipt of copy of the order.

¶25

All questions are kept open and liberty is granted to the Petitioners to approach this Court in case any grievance arises after taking of decision by Respondent No.6 on the proposal sent to him by Respondent No.9.

¶26

Writ petitions are disposed of in the above terms.

¶27

(G.A. SANAP, J.)

¶28

2 of 2

Girish Vasant Patil and Os v. the State of Maharashtra Thr. Secretary and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Girish Vasant Patil and Os v. the State of Maharashtra Thr. Secretary and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Shobha Adinath Fuke Vs the State of Maharashtra, Department of Secondary School Education, Thr. Secretary and Ors.

Aruna Arjun Gangavane @ Mrs. Varsha Vasant Maske Vs State of Maharashtra Thr. Secretary Tribal Development Detp. and Ors.

The President Harun Mahamudkha Pathan Vs the Education Officer (Primary) Zilha Parishad, and Ors.

Kum. Akanksha Balasaheb Shinde Vs State of Maharashtra Thr. Secretary and Anr.

Ananda Bapu Patil and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra, through the Secretary and Ors.

Shri. Daundkar Yashwant Maruti and Ors. Vs Shree Shail Mallikarjun Educational Trust and Ors.