In this review petition, the High Court of Bombay found no apparent error in the impugned order dismissing a writ petition before it. The Court held that no case for review was made out and dismissed the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
YS.Patil
11-RPW-30-2022
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
REVIEW PETITION NO. 30 OF 2022 IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 18 OF 2022
Harita Sunil Parab and Anr.
.. Petitioners
Versus
Smt. Shivani Vichare and Ors.
.. Respondents
Ms. Harita Parab in person.
Ms. Kavita N. Solunke AGP for the Respondent-State.
CORAM: A. A. SAYED & ABHAY AHUJA, JJ.
DATE : 15th JUNE 2022
P.C. :-
March 2022. The said order reads as follows:-“
“ The Petitioner who is an Advocate and is appearing in-person, has filed this Writ Petition interalia praying for directions to lodge FIR against various persons, demolish alleged illegal construction in Bungalow No. 104 and other Bungalows at Aram Nagar,J.P.Road and for compensation of Rs. 1.00 Crore.
YS.Patil 2 11-RPW-30-2022 appropriate that the above Petition is placed before the same Bench which is hearing Criminal Writ Petition No. 3499 of 2019 (and companion Writ Petitions).
(ABHAY AHUJA, J.)
Digitally signed YUGANDHARASHARAD byYUGANDHARASHARAD PATIL PATIL Date: 2022.06.17 17:51:56 +0530
1 issue framed by the court
Whether any case for review of the order dated 25th March 2022 is made out in these review proceedings.
Harita Sunil Parab
Smt. Shivani Vichare and Ors.
A. A. Sayed
Abhay Ahuja
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
