Disposed
Mr. Rambhau Mahadev Tayade v. State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Bombay HCPIL/37/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Urmila Ingale IN THE HIGH COURT OF…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Urmila Ingale
Digitally signed URMILAPRAMOD by URMILAPRAMODINGALEDate: INGALE 2022.02.1116:19:11 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 37 OF 2017
Mr. Rambhau Mahadev Tayade .. Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra and ors. .. Respondents
Ms. Vidya Nair i/b Mr. Madhusudan G. Gawde, for Petitioner. Mr. P. P. Kakade, GP a/w Mr. M. M. Pabale, AGP for State. Mr. Chetan Kapadia, Ms. Vidisha Rohira, Mr. Suryakant Jadhav i/b Mr. Nikhil Randive, for Respondent No. 3.
CORAM : DIPANKAR DATTA, CJ & M. S. KARNIK, J.
DATE : FEBRUARY 11, 2022
P.C. :
(M. S. KARNIK, J.) (CHIEF JUSTICE)
1
Mr. Rambhau Mahadev Tayade
The State of Maharashtra
Dipankar Datta
M. S. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court