The High Court disposed of a writ petition upon parties executing consent minutes of order. The court upheld the settlement terms despite grammatical errors in the minutes.
Writ petition disposed of in terms of consent minutes dated February 8, 2022. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
9.wp.1059-22.doc
PMB
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Digitally signed by PRADNYA PRADNYA MAKARAND MAKARAND BHOGALE BHOGALE Date: 2022.02.09 18:34:26 +0530
WRIT PETITION NO. 1059 OF 2022
Shailesh Narayan Shinde and ors. ..Petitioners vs.
The Registrar, Debts Recovery Tribunal, Pune and ors. ..Respondents
Ms. Kavita Shinde i/b. Mr. Ashok B. Tajane for petitioners. Mr. M.M. Pabale, AGP for State.
Mr. Nikhil Rajani a/w Apoorva Kulkarni, Mr. Rupak Swangikar i/b. V. Deshpande & Co. for respondent no. 3.
CORAM : DIPANKAR DATTA, CJ & M. S. KARNIK, J.
DATE : FEBRUARY 9, 2022.
P.C. :
1
9.wp.1059-22.doc
the said minutes, therefore, notwithstanding the grammatical mistakes, the present writ petition is disposed of in terms of the terms contained in the minutes of order. The parties agree to abide by the terms contained in the minutes of order. It is clarified that if the petitioners fail to abide by the terms provided in the minutes of order, it will be open for the respondent no. 3 to proceed against them in accordance with law.
(M. S. KARNIK, J.) (CHIEF JUSTICE)
2
Shailesh Narayan Shinde and ors.
The Registrar, Debts Recovery Tribunal, Pune and ors.
Dipankar Datta
M. S. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
