This High Court of Bombay excused a four-day delay in depositing requisite funds for security. It extended an interim stay order related to a SARFAESI Act application pending transfer of jurisdiction to DRT-III.
Delay of four days in deposit excused; stay order continued until February 28 or further DRT orders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
44-WP-243-2022
Pdp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 243 OF 2022
Dinesh Govind Ghostekar & Anr. ..Petitioners Vs.
Union of India & Anr.
..Respondents
Mr. Prakash N. Ganwani i/by Manish R. Bohra for petitioners.
Mr. Mohamedali M. Chunawala i/by Mr. A. A. Ansari for respondent no.1-UOI.
Mr. R. L. Motwani for respondent no.2.
CORAM : DIPANKAR DATTA, CJ & M. S. KARNIK, J.
DATE : FEBRUARY 10, 2022.
P.C. :
1/2
44-WP-243-2022
6. All contentions are left open.
SALUNKE J V
Digitally signed by SALUNKE J V Date: 2022.02.11 11:56:46 +0530
(M. S. KARNIK, J.) (CHIEF JUSTICE)
2/2
Dinesh Govind Ghostekar & Anr.
Union of India & Anr.
Dipankar Datta
M. S. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
