Disposed
Arvind Tripathi v. the State of Maharashtra for Ministry of Public Work Dept. and Ors.
Bombay HCPIL/102/2021
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Urmila Ingale IN THE HIGH COURT OF…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Urmila Ingale
URMILA Digitally signedby URMILA PRAMOD PRAMOD INGALE INGALE Date: 2022.06.2718:56:58 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 102 OF 2021 WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 9867 OF 2022 WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 9866 OF 2022 WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3799 OF 2021
Arvind Tripathi .. Petitioner
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra and ors. .. Respondents ALONG WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3523 OF 2021 IN
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 102 OF 2021
M/s. Jai Bharat Constructions .. Applicant
In the matter between
Arvind Tripathi .. Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra and ors. .. Respondents
Mr. Sunny Udasi a/w Mr. Nikhil Agrawal, for Petitioner in PIL/102/2021 & for Applicant in IA/9867/2022, IA/9866/2022, IA/3799/2021.
Mr. P. P. Kakade, GP a/w Mr. B.V. Samant, AGP for State.
Dr. Birendra Saraf, Senior Advocate a/w Mr. Kezen Kharawala, Mr. Pradosh Patil i/b Lex Juris, for Respondent No. 4.
Mr. Zubin Behramdin i/b Mr. Chaitanya Bhadarkar, for Respondent No. 5.
Mr. Sahil Mahajan, for Respondent No. 6.
1
CORAM : DIPANKAR DATTA, CJ & M. S. KARNIK, J.
DATE : JUNE 27, 2022
P.C. :
2
Arvind Tripathi
The State of Maharashtra and ors.
Dipankar Datta
M. S. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court