The High Court at Bombay, Appellate Side, Aurangabad, permitted the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition and institute fresh ones on related subjects. The original petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition and institute fresh writ petitions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
SSC
IN THE HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 32 OF 2022
Vinayak s/o. Manikrao Kale
....Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others
....Respondents
Mr. S.S. Tope, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. A.R. Kale, A.G.P. for respondent/State.
CORAM : DIPANKAR DATTA, C.J. & RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.
DATED : JULY 04, 2022.
PER COURT :
After hearing of the writ petition progressed for some time,
Mr. S.S. Tope, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the same and to institute fresh writ petitions, in accordance with law.
[ RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. ] [ CHIEF JUSTICE ]
Vinayak s/o. Manikrao Kale
The State of Maharashtra
Dipankar Datta
Ravindra V. Ghuge
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
