The High Court converted an anticipatory bail application to a regular bail order after the applicant married the victim and they reside together. An interim application was also disposed of.
The anticipatory bail application was declared absolute and the interim application was disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Digitally signed by PRAJAKTA PRAJAKTASAGAR SAGARVARTAKDate: VARTAK 2022.10.07 14:45:29 +0530
1
2.aba 2914-21 IA 364-22.doc
Prajakta Vartak
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2914 OF 2021
Mr. Rohit Bhaskar Dubey.. Applicant
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra... Respondent
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 364 OF 2022
Meenakshi Shukla .. Intervenor
In the matter between
Rohit Bhaskar Dubey.. Applicant
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra... Respondent
Mr. Dhrutiman S. Joshi & Sadhava Yadav for the applicant.
Ms. Sartaj Shaikh for the respondent no.2.
Smt. Rutuja Ambekar, APP for the State.
API Smt. Nayana Patil Wadala Police Station.
CORAM :BHARATI DANGRE, J.
DATE :OCTOBER 06, 2022.
P.C.:
1. Learned counsel for the applicant states that the applicant has
married the victim girl and they are residing together. This statement is
not disputed by the learned APP.
2. In the wake of the above statement, the order dated 07 December,
2021 is made absolute.
In the wake of the disposal of the anticipatory bail application,
Interim Application No. 364 of 2022 also stands disposed of.
(SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J.)
Rohit Bhaskar Dubey
The State of Maharashtra
Meenakshi Shukla
BHARATI DANGRE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court