This court rejected the bail application by the applicant, who had previously been denied bail in Sessions Case No. 15 of 2020. The court found no change in circumstances, noting the corroboration of FIR by witnesses, the framing of charges, and the issuance of witness summons.
The bail application is rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1 BA 52. 450.22.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO.450 OF 2022
Sandeep Palsingh Parcha @ Sandip .. Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent
Mr.Sudeep Pasbola, Mr. Adhesh Kondeshmukh i/b Mr. Ayush Pasbola for the applicant. Ms.Veera Shinde, APP for the State.
CORAM: BHARATI DANGRE, J. DATED : 6th OCTOBER, 2022
P.C:-
( SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J.)
Ashish Mhaske
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to bail in Sessions Case No. 15 of 2020 despite prior rejection.
Sandeep Palsingh Parcha @ Sandip
The State of Maharashtra
Bharati Dangre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
