Dismissed
Ankur Hemant Nagwan v. State of Maharashtra
Bombay HCABA/590/2022
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
590_2022.doc Vidya Amin IN THE HIGH COURT OF…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Digitally signed VIDYA by VIDYASURESH AMIN SURESH Date: AMIN 2022.10.0610:37:40 +0530
1
Vidya Amin
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 590 of 2022
Ankur Hemant Nagwan.. Applicant
Vs.
State of Maharashtra & Anr. .. Respondents
Mr. Subhash Jha with Mr. Siddharth Jha, Mr. Dwivendra Dubey and Mr.
Tushar Bansode for the applicant.
Mr. S. H. Yadav, APP for the State.
Mr. Parag Pokale for the Intervener.
API Mr. Prakash Dinkar, Kalva Police Station present.
CORAM :BHARATI DANGRE, J.
DATE :OCTOBER 04, 2022.
P.C.:
1. The applicant was admitted to protection by order dated 4th
March, 2022 and was directed to attend the Investigating officer, as
learned APP, on instructions of the Investigating officer Mr. Prakash
Dinkar, who is present in the Court, state the custodial interrogation of
the applicant is not necessary.
2. Accepting the aforesaid statement, the order dated 4th March,
2022 is made absolute.
3. Application is disposed of.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ankur Hemant Nagwan
State of Maharashtra
BHARATI DANGRE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court