In this contempt petition filed after the State assured appointment steps would be taken within 3-4 months, the Court declined to take cognizance of contempt and disposed of the petition.
Contempt petition disposed of; Court not inclined to take cognizance of contempt.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1)
4-cp-84-2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CONT. PETITION NO.84 OF 2022
IN PIL/64/2020
LOKJAGAR FOUNDATION THR ITS PRESIDENT PANDHARINATH
SHANKARRAO SABLE..PETITIONER
VERSUS
DEBASHISH CHAKRABRTY AND OTHERS
..RESPONDENTS
Mr. D. B. Bhange, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr. A. R. Kale, AGP for Respondents-State.
Mr. P. P. More, Advocate for Respondent No.3.
… CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA & S. G. DIGE, JJ. DATED : 14th FEBRUARY, 2022.
PER COURT:-
1.At present we are not inclined to take
cognizance of the contempt.
2.The statement was made by the learned
A.G.P. that, within a period of 3-4 months the
steps would be taken for appointment. Four months
would lapse in January 2022 and immediately the
contempt is filed. If within a reasonable time
appointments are not made, then the petitioner may
agitate afresh.
3.With the aforesaid observations, Contempt
Petition is disposed of.
Devendra/February-2022
Lokjagar Foundation/thru its President Pandharinath Shankarrao Sable
Debeshish Chakrabarty
S. V. Gangapurwala
S. G. Dige
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court