Allowed
Bhimsing Harsing Pawara v. Gitanjali Prakash Patil and Others
Bombay HCCA/1343/2022
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
910-CA-1343-22.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1343 OF 2022 IN WP/2549/2018 WITH WP/2549/2018
BHIMSING HARSING PAWARA
VERSUS
GITANJALI PRAKASH PATIL AND OTHERS
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Sandesh R. Patil Advocate for Non applicatn No. 1 : Mr. Awate h/f Talekar and Associates AGP for Respondents No.2 to 4 -State : Mr. S. P. Tiwari Advocate for Respondents No. 5 and 6 : Mr. N. E. Deshmukh
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND S. G. DIGE, JJ.
DATE : 11th FEBRUARY, 2022
PER COURT :-
( S.G. DIGE ) ( S.V. GANGAPURWALA ) JUDGE JUDGE
mtk
Bhimsing Harsing Pwara
Gitanjali Prakash Patil
S. V. Gangapurwala
S. G. Dige
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court