In this bail application, the court held that sufficient prima facie material indicated the applicant's guilt due to the recovery of counterfeit notes and matching prints. Despite long incarceration, the bail application was rejected.
Bail application rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/2 917 BA-314-22.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO.314 OF 2022
Darasing Arjun Sukale .. Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent
Mr.Ganesh Gupta for the Applicant. Mr.S.V.Gavand, A.P.P. for the State/Respondent.
CORAM: BHARATI DANGRE, J. DATED : 11th OCTOBER, 2022
P.C:-
I am not inclined to entertain the application, despite the fact of long incarceration of the applicant, since the applicant
M.M.Salgaonkar
2/2 917 BA-314-22.doc
is facing charge under Section 489(D), which is punishable with imprisonment for life or with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fne.
the trial, as expeditiously as possible.
( SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J.)
M.M.Salgaonkar
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the applicant accused of counterfeiting currency notes who is already in long incarceration.
Whether there is sufficient prima facie material to indicate the guilt of the applicant warranting a rejection of bail.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Darasing Arjun Sukale
The State of Maharashtra
BHARATI DANGRE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
