Alpesh Kumar Suresh Kumar Jain Vs the State of Maharashtra

1/2 29 BA 297-22.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 297 OF 2022

.. Alpesh Kumar Suresh Kumar Jain Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent

Mr.Adil Khatri for the applicant in BA No.297/2022. Mr.S.H.Yadav, APP for the State. PSI Shri S.S. Tawade from DCB CID, UNIT-IX present.

¶5

CORAM: BHARATI DANGRE, J. DATED : 11^th OCTOBER, 2022

¶6

P.C:-

¶7

1 On expressing my disinclination to entertain the application, on merits of the matter, in the wake of the material compiled against the present applicant in the charge-sheet, learned counsel seek permission to withdraw the application. Permission is granted.

¶8

Learned counsel also submits that the issue as to whether the charge-sheet not being accompanied with the report of Chemical Analysis of the seized substance, is an incomplete one, is pending before the Hon’ble Apex court. The learned counsel is reminded of the fact that as far as the Bombay High Court is concerned, the issue has been put to rest on a reference

¶9

Tilak

¶10

2/2 29 BA 297-22.doc

¶11

being answered of the Division Bench of this Court at Goa in Manas Krishna TK Vs. The State, Goa in Criminal Misc. Application (Bail) No.88/2021.

¶12

2 Hence, according to me, as far as Bombay High Court is concerned, the issue is foreclosed till the Supreme Court reverses the said decision. However, since the learned counsel for the applicant had sought permission to withdraw the application, he is granted liberty to approach this Court in case if the law point as regards incomplete charge-sheet is reversed by the Bombay High Court, and when he shall be able to submit that the chargesheet was an incomplete one.

¶13

3 Reserving the above said liberty, application is disposed off as withdrawn.

¶14

( SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J.)

¶15

Tilak

Alpesh Kumar Suresh Kumar Jain v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Alpesh Kumar Suresh Kumar Jain v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kamal Jagdish Singh vs Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority

Motilal NAGAR-1 Panchshil Co-Op Housing Society Limited vs the State of Maharashtra and 3 Ors.

Mumtaz Izaz Shaikh Vs the State of Maharashtra

Deepa Sharma and Anr. vs Uma Constructions and 3 Ors.

Darasing Arjun Sukale Vs State of Maharashtra

Dr. Nayan Suresh Brahme Vs State of Maharashtra