Allowed

Mahender Pal Singh and 2 Ors. v. State of Goa, Thr. Senior Inspector, Calangute Police Station, Calangute and Anr.

Bombay HC26 Jul 2021WPCR/32/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Criminal Writ Petition regarding State of Goa petitioners sought leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to place documents before the Investigating Officer. The High Court granted such leave.

What did the court decide?

Leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to place documents/explanation before the Investigating Officer.

Mahender Pal Singh and 2 Ors. Vs State of Goa, Thr… — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2021)

¶1

4-WPCR-32-2021.DOC

¶2

Niti

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.32 OF 2021

¶4

MAHENDER PAL SINGH AND 2 ORS.

¶5

...PETITIONERS

¶6

Versus

¶7

STATE OF GOA, THR. SENIOR INSPECTOR, CALANGUTE POLICE STATION, CALANGUTE AND ANR.

¶8

…RESPONDENTS

¶9

Mr. Arvind Kumar Shukla, Mr. Prayash Shirodkar and Mr. Nihal Ahamad, Advocate for the Petitioners.

¶10

Mr. Pravin Faldessai, Addl. Public Prosecutor for the Respondents.

¶11

CORAM: M. S. SONAK & M. S. JAWALKAR, JJ DATED: 26^th July 2021

¶12

P.C. :

¶13

1. Heard Mr. Arvind Kumar Shukla, Mr. Prayash Shirodkar and Mr. Nihal Ahamad, the learned Counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Pravin Faldessai, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the Respondents.

¶14

2. After this matter was argued for some time, Mr. Shukla, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw this petition with liberty to place documents and explanation before the Investigating Officer. He submits that some directions be issued to the Investigating

¶15

Page 1 of 2 26^th July 2021

¶16

4-WPCR-32-2021.DOC

¶17

Officer to consider such documents and the explanation that the petitioners will offer in the matter.

¶18

3. Mr. Faldessai, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor states that if any documents are produced and explanation is offered by the petitioners, then the Investigating Officer, in the course of his investigations, will certainly consider the same.

¶19

4. Accordingly, we grant leave to the petitioners to withdraw this petition with liberty to place documents/explanation before the Investigating Officer. The statement of Mr. Faldessai that such documents/explanation will be considered by the Investigating Officer in accordance with law and on its own merits is also accepted.

¶20

5. This petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

¶21

M. S. JAWALKAR, J.

¶22

M. S. SONAK, J.

¶23

Digitally signed by NITI K NITI K HALDANKAR HALDANKAR Date: 2021.07.26 17:18:15 +05'30'

¶24

Page 2 of 2 26^th July 2021

Mahender Pal Singh and 2 Ors. v. State of Goa, Thr. Senior Inspector, Calangute Police Station, Calangute and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mahender Pal Singh and 2 Ors. v. State of Goa, Thr. Senior Inspector, Calangute Police Station, Calangute and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Lina Naik., Vs Girish Pillai and Anr.

Suresh @ Surya Naik, Presently in Judicial Custody in Modern Jail and Anr. Vs State, Thr. Public Prosecutor

Pawan Prabhudesai., Vs State of Goa, Thr. the Chief Secretary and Anr.

Prasad Madhu Shirodkar Vs Superintendent of Police (Hq), Panaji and 5 Ors.

Goa State Co-Op Milk Producers Union Ltd. Vs State of Goa, through Chief Secretary and 2 Ors.

Seeta Anil Naik Vs State of Goa, Thr. Police Inspector, Verna Police Station, Verna and 2 Ors.