Prasad Madhu Shirodkar v. Superintendent of Police (Hq), Panaji and 5 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 118…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
21-WP118-2021.DOC
vinita
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
WRIT PETITION NO. 118 OF 2021.
PRASAD MADHU SHIRODKAR …Petitioner
Versus SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE (HQ), PANAJI AND 5 ORS
…Respondents
Mr. O. Kulkarni Frias, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. M. Salkar, Govt. Advocate for the Respondents.
CORAM: M. S. SONAK & M. S. JAWALKAR, JJ DATED: 26th July 2021
P.C.:
1. Mr. Salkar, learned Government Advocate states that by order dated 14.7.2021, the petitioner, has been sanctioned his TA and DA and the amount will be paid to the petitioner alongwith his salary for the next month.
2. Mr. Kulkarni, confirms aforesaid position and agrees that relief in this petition stands worked out. Mr. Kulkarni, on instructions, further states that cost of Rs.5000/- has been received by the petitioner and the petitioner has already distributed this amount of cost to the flood victims in the North Goa. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of
3. Concerned respondent to ensure that TA/DA amount is actually paid to the petitioner along with salary.
M. S. JAWALKAR, J.
M. S. SONAK, J.
Page 1 of 1 26th July 2021
Digitally signed by VINITA VIKAS NAIK Date: 2021.07.27 15:52:15 +05'30'
VINITA VIKAS NAIK
PRASAD MADHU SHIRODKAR
SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE (HQ), PANAJI
M. S. SONAK
M. S. JAWALKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court