The High Court dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution due to a failure of the petitioner to file necessary instructions. Objections raised in the petition were kept open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 WP907-16.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO. 907/2016
(NOORINISA KADIR SHAH VERSUS DIVISIONAL CASTE CERTIFICATE SCRUTINY COMMITTEE, AMRAVATI & OTHERS)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's order and Registrar's orders.
Ms S.S. Jachak, A.G.P. for the R-1. Shri C.A. Babrekar, counsel for the R-3.
CORAM : A. S. CHANDURKAR AND G.A. SANAP, JJ.
TH : 13 DECEMBER, 2021 .
D ATED
The learned counsel for the petitioner has filed pursis stating therein that the petitioner has not given necessary instructions for further prosecution of the proceedings.
In the writ petition, the validity certificate granted to the respondent no.3 is under challenge.
Considering the contents of the pursis, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. However, the points raised in the writ petition are kept open. No costs.
APTE
Signed By: Digitally signed byROHIT DATTATRAYA APTE Signing Date:14.12.2021 11:11
NOORINISA KADIR SHAH
DIVISIONAL CASTE CERTIFICATE SCRUTINY COMMITTEE, AMRAVATI
OTHERS
A. S. CHANDURKAR
G.A. SANAP
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
